Networks refuse to air offensive ad

SDG here with a story about an outrageously offensive TV spot produced by the United Church of Christ — and how CBS and NBC made the right decision in refusing to air it.

First, a word of clarification. The United Church of Christ (UCC) is a liberal-mainline denomination, not to be confused with a number of similar-sounding groups, including the Fundamentalist sect known as the Boston Movement Church of Christ, perhaps best known for their insistence that Christians outside their own fold cannot be saved.

The liberal-mainline UCC certainly doesn’t teach anything like that — in fact, they pride themselves on their non-exclusiveness, openness, and acceptance. For example, if you administer abortions for a living, or are in a committed same-sex relationship, the UCC wants you to know that you are welcomed and accepted, not judged, at their church.

In fact, the UCC takes such pride in their non-exclusiveness and acceptance that they recently produced a satiric 30-second TV spot lampooning other Christian churches that don’t share their openness, specifically on homosexuality.

That’s right: They’re so open and accepting, they want to go on national television and ridicule other believers and church communities who disagree with their beliefs.

You can view the ad in RealPlayer at the UCC website here. For those who can’t view it, here’s a description:

The 30-second spot opens with a shot of people converging on a gothic stone church as church bells peal. Among them we see a pair of stylish, urban-looking young men who are holding hands, making it clear that they are a gay couple. Then comes the kicker: They’re stopped at the door of the church by a pair of intimidating-looking bouncers with shaved heads and black T-shirts. “No. Step aside please,” one of the bouncers says commandingly, holding up an outstretched hand to stop the young men.

That’s  when we see that the entrance to the church is roped off, like the entrance to an exclusive club, and the bouncers open the rope for those they deem acceptable. These include a pair of conservative-looking women in pastel colors and skirts and a man in a suit accompanied by a woman one would assume is his wife. Others are also stopped, including a young Latino man (“No way. Not you”) and a very young black girl (“I don’t think so”), as the bouncers snap the rope back into place with a resounding click and the camera focuses on the hard face of the near bouncer.

Fade to black. “Jesus didn’t turn people away,” a title announces as inspirational music rises in the background. “Neither do we.” Cut to a shot of a happy group of people standing together. “The United Church of Christ,” says an announcer, as quick close-up cuts emphasize the diversity and acceptance of the UCC. “No matter who you are, or where you are on life’s journey… you’re welcome here.”

The last of these close-ups is a shot of two women, one with her arm around the other, hand draped across her shoulder, as if in counterpoint to the hand-holding gay males stopped at the door of that Other Church.

The not-so-subtle message: “Churches that don’t accept homosexuality are unfriendly, exclusive clubs that are only for the few — and that goes against Jesus.”

What is so incredibly offensive and appalling about this ad is that it doesn’t just emphasize the UCC’s own “welcoming” stance toward same-sex couples, it actually directly ridicules churches that teach differently — like a political campaign ad lampooning the competition.

Had the UCC ad merely showed hand-holding, neck-embracing same-sex couples being welcomed and accepted at the UCC church, that in itself would be harmful enough, but it wouldn’t have been nearly as over-the-top offensive as the ad actually is. We expect satiric ads lampooning the competition from political candidates and burger chains, not from Christian communions.

Can you imagine an ad from, say, the Southern Baptists, ridiculing other churches and believers for taking positions contrary to those of the Southern Baptists? I’m not talking about positively emphasizing their own position, but specifically showing other churches that take a different view and making them look ridiculous or unattractive?

If the Southern Baptists produced a positive ad emphasizing, say, their pro-life values, I would support that. But what about a satiric commercial lampooning other churches that are pro-abortion?

Let’s imagine such an ad. Let’s say the Baptists produced an ad depicting a troubled young woman going to her pastor and his wife and intimating that she was pregnant out of wedlock. And let’s say (since the UCC ad satirizes coercive use of force) that, to her shock and increasing alarm, the pastor and his wife begin pressuring her to “do something about it,” eventually dragging her from the room.

Or suppose it wasn’t even that over the top. Suppose they only took a laughingly lackadaisical tone: “Hey girlfriend, do what makes you feel good! After all, that’s how you got here! Kill the kid, don’t kill the kid, it’s your choice!” (“Jesus didn’t excuse sin. Neither do we. The Southern Baptists.”)

Would that be an appropriate message for a TV spot? Absolutely not. To bring the smear-and-satirize tactics of mudslinging TV politics to the vital work of evangelization, apologetics, and religious argument is degrading and offensive — no matter what the issue is. That the UCC is in fact wrong in its stance on the particular subject at hand only compounds the problem.

There’s no getting around the fact that some people hold views that are offensive to other people. Our views offend them, and their views offend us. That’s a fact of life. But because it’s a fact of life, it’s also a fact of life that we observe certain rules in how we express and articulate those differences, so as not to give unnecessary offense.

The Mormons have been advertising on TV for years, and AFAIK they’ve always been careful to do it in a way that is positive and doesn’t come off like a swipe at anybody else. I’ve also seen Catholic poster ads in the NYC subway system that have likewise been positive and not satirized the defects of other churches as a way of enhancing the Church’s claims, because this kind of attack on the competition in media advertising is not the way to carry out dialogue about why we believe our own church is better than other churches.

Now for the good news. CBS and NBC executives recognized that these ads were far too inflammatory and refused to run them, citing the ongoing political discussion about same-sex unions as grounds for regarding the topic as too hot to approach in this manner.

Predictably, the UCC is shocked — shocked!  (Here’s their side of the story.)

If you’d like to let the networks know you appreciate their prudential judgment in this matter, here’s where to write:

CBS (click on “Feedback” link at the bottom)

NBC – Contact Us (under “Select Show,” choose “Other”)

If you’d like to let the UCC know why their spot is problematic, contact Barb Powell, press contact (216-736-2175).

Author: Jimmy Akin

Jimmy was born in Texas, grew up nominally Protestant, but at age 20 experienced a profound conversion to Christ. Planning on becoming a Protestant seminary professor, he started an intensive study of the Bible. But the more he immersed himself in Scripture the more he found to support the Catholic faith, and in 1992 he entered the Catholic Church. His conversion story, "A Triumph and a Tragedy," is published in Surprised by Truth. Besides being an author, Jimmy is the Senior Apologist at Catholic Answers, a contributing editor to Catholic Answers Magazine, and a weekly guest on "Catholic Answers Live."

8 thoughts on “Networks refuse to air offensive ad”

  1. The most ludicrous thing about the UCC’s 30 seconds of self-love is the notion that there churches of any consequence turning away anyone–including gays–at the doors. Sure gays may be excluded from the occasional communion line, but I can’t think of any church–especially the hardline evangelical ones–that wouldn’t love to have homosexuals in, if for no other reason than to offer the Gospel to them.
    Oh, and yes–blacks, Latinos and the disabled are routinely given the boot–on what planet again? Bull Connor’s dead, but the UCC seems oddly nostalgic for the era.

  2. The most ludicrous thing about the UCC’s 30 seconds of self-love is the notion that there churches of any consequence turning away anyone–including gays–at the doors.

    Of course that’s the satirical conceit — the idea is that other churches aren’t welcoming of gays and make them FEEL excluded, as if there WERE bouncers or something. It’s obviously meant as an exaggeration, but it’s offensive nonetheless.
    And, yes, certainly the whole minority thing is completely over the top ridiculous.

  3. Where I live, one of the local churches of the so-called United Church of Christ left the denomination a few months ago because of its liberalism.
    Wouldn’t it be nice if the last few Christians in the UCC quit and the NCC and the WCC kicked them out, Rome broke off ecumenical relations, etc. Of course none of that will happen. Just like when the Episcopal Church ordained Robinson, people hemmed and hawed, but business as usual.

  4. others are also stopped, including a young Latino man (“No way. Not you”) and a very young black girl (“I don’t think so”)
    Ah yes…the default all-purpose liberal argument: “You’re a racist!”
    Hmmm, do they welcome homophobic racist papist pig-dogs? I wonder…

  5. I do agree the UCC ad is obnoxious and misleading; however…
    Actually, many churches do a fairly good job of excluding people with disabilities just by ignoring their needs (this is an equal-opportunity sin for Prostestants, Catholics, and Jews based on my esperience.)
    If your parish has a relatively orthodox clergy, fully wheelchair-accessible facilities (don’t forget the restroom, confessionals, and the ambo); a signer for the Deaf, and large print or Braille bulletins, then I’d love to move near you!
    Newer church facilities are often better. Unfortunately, newer church facilities are often paired with, um, interesting theology!
    When I lived in a certain town in the American Southwest (rhymes with Hag’s Laugh) I could not use ANY restroom at ANY parish in the city. And I do not drive. No coffee and doughnuts after mass or church suppers for me unless I planned very carefully.
    Sorry, Jimmy, if this constitutes a thread hijack; if so, delete with my apologies; but I did want to mention this.

  6. Heh, I grew up in Hag’s Laugh myself, although as a Protestant I’m not familiar with the interior layout of most of the town’s parish churches. I have been in churches of many denominations whose buildings did seem to predate the invention of the wheelchair.
    Of course, one of the ad’s many problems is that it equates a matter of historic Christian doctrine with a correctable architectural oversight. It’s too bad the point about accessibilty couldn’t have been made fairly and delicately. Given Jesus’ special concern for people with physical afflictions, it does seem particularly desirable for churches to have facilities accessible to those with disabilities.

  7. I clicked on the link to view “Their Side of the story” and it said at the end that the ad will be airing, that communications “broke down” and it will air on NIck@Nite, TV Land, and other shows. I’m confused; is that just their way of saying we’ll fight to the end, or is it really going to be put on. I sent a feedback to CBS and totally supported their decision. As for the parishes with non-handicapped accessibility, I feel sorry for you, and maybe you can take it up with your pastor or bishop.

Comments are closed.