I'm with ya scooter. I had a $50 gift certificate from amazon, so I sent off for crystal and mike. I am mentally salivating over the endless possibilties: the fathers, catechism, online classics, etc. I spend a lot of time in transit as well.

Thanks to Jimmy, I've been using the trial version of text aloud recently. I use it for readings from a doctoral class. I stick the files on my ipod and listen on the way to and from work (2 hours of driving each day). It's been great so far!

Thanks Jeff!

MenTaLguY,
Maureen has recorded the encyclical in her voice here:
http://marialectrix.blogspot.com/
Scroll down since it is broken up by section.

Yea, I'd not recommend 64-bit machines even to most Windows users. Not to hijack the combox but this is a good place to say it. I tried to tell my brother how unhappy I was with it but he bought one anyway, and now he's frustrated too, even using 64-bit Windows. Lots of vendors just don't make 64-bit drivers for hardware, for one thing. He says, "At least I'm ready for the future!" and he sucked it up, and put a 32-bit Windows and Linux on it.
The good thing is that you *can* put a 32-bit OS on it if you want, and not have these problems.
The good thing about more people using 64-bit machines is, eventually the drivers and software will come, by virtue of demand.
I like the speed and I'm willing to pioneer and be counted among the 64-bit users and ask for 64-bit software and drivers, and speed along the conversion of the world to 64-bit, assuming it'll happen. If you're like that, and you don't mind the inconveniences, go for it. But if it were my mom or my cousin Joe Six Pack, I'd recommend them a fast 32-bit machine. My husband has one just as fast as my machine. And I do think I'll put a 32-bit OS back on here next time I have a hard drive failure--at least a dual-boot. :-)

While TTS is fast, it's been a few days now. Has anyone done a proper recording with a human reading yet? If not, I've been contemplating doing a "Deus Caritas Est" podcast...

Exactly! I debated whether got with 32 or 64 bits and I finally went with 32 bits for better compatibility. I don't think 64 bits is justified for most people.
As for Xine it is possible to compile it for a 64 bit machine without braking anything... but it is a crippled version that wouldn't be worth the trouble. The developpers are working on it though.
Anyway I think I've hijacked that comments threat long enough..

Yea, Xine is very good too. But I have an Athlon 64-bit machine, so to make it play some things, I'd need a 32-bit version on my 64-bit machine, and installing the 32-bit version would break too many other 64-bit programs. I was able to compile Mplayer to be 32-bit without breaking anything else that I'm aware of. I thought maybe extending my Xine with pitfdll (either 32-bit or 64-bit) might bring luck, but no joy so far. Next time I install an OS, I'm just going to spare myself and install a 32-bit version. They don't seem to run much slower on here, anyway. :-)

MPlayer is definitely a great program. I do tend to use Xine a lot more though since I like it better for DVD playback (it supports DVD menus).
As a matter of fact Xine is catching up with MPlayer if you count all the plugins that are available for it.

Oh, here's something else I hadn't seen. This is cross-platform (works with Java) and also integrates with Firefox by way of a Firefox extension (downloaded separately). It's based on FreeTTS and is open source.
CLC-4-TTS
It should run on any system that has Java, from the looks of it. (...off to check it out)

what's evil about Real's player? i use it to watch EWTN TV-feeds all the time...
I just remember it being obnoxious, like Quicktime, under Windows, with its Start Center and nags and connections behind your back. In Linux it's not evil; it just .......Buffering.........
...hogs a ton of CPU.
MPlayer is hands down the best app I've tried in any OS--it can play everything I throw at it, and it comes with a browser plugin, and Mencoder that can convert just about any video format under the sun. I'd like to see Windows users have a version comparable to that for Linux someday. There was already an attempt to get it out of production, but it lives on, since the EU wisely decided that software patents are ridiculous. (Under them, you can patent something like a Progress Bar or a File Manager, meaning that even if you wrote your own Progress Bar from scratch, you were violating someone's Progress Bar patent. And yes, someone patented the Progress Bar already. If you have any apps with a progress bar, and I know you all probably do, you're technically violating a patent.)

Most Linux boxen no longer play mp3s by default because of the legality of that being fuzzy. I'm not nitpicking; I just wanted to point out the stupidity of that. It doesn't hold anybody back from playing them--SuSE allows an update to remedy the situation even though they won't put the software on their CDs, and there are dozens of applications for Linux that can play them and/or convert them, including a less-evil but CPU-hogging version of Real Player for Linux, as well as cool open source programs.
I prefer .ogg files; they're an open source format and sound better anyway. Some people even install a special Linux-based "OS" on their iPods for extra functionality and to play their .ogg files. My husband SO wouldn't let me try to do that, tho! ;-)
Anyone in the open source world might want to try out "festival" (text-to-speech application). I played with it for the first time last night because of this article, just to see how it was. It also comes with a text2wav component to record a .wav. I'm not done researching all of the possible front ends and tie-in programs, but I imagine there are dozens.
I had festival render The Raven for me last night and it wasn't too bad. Jimmy's is probably better overall, though festival didn't stumble on some consonant combinations that Text aloud did (e.g. the "mb" in "chamber" sounds better).
For the curious/geeky types:
Festival Sample MP3
It always amazes me, the sheer number of open source projects out there!

The AT&T system has a huge database of prerecorded utterances from a human speaker which it chops and forms to form new utterances. So I believe some common phrases might be completely canned. I don't know the nuts and bolts of how the voices in the old systems got synthesized, but they didn't have enough memory to store even a minute of audio so they must have done something else -- convert the words into sequences of phonemes and then maybe the phonemes were recorded or maybe they were synthesized too.

which sound so good that I suspect they are reverse-engineered from individual people
I could be wrong, but I think the voices in these type of programs have always been reverse-engineered from human voices. I think it was always just a matter of how they get processed (both in the reverse-engineering and when making new words from the sounds you have.)
Hey, anybody remember Dr. Sbaitso? He was cool (talking chatter box psychiatrist from back in the days of 8-bit sound cards.)

I also use TextAloud with the AT&T voices and you're right the technology has come along way. I have listened to a bunch of e-texts and books and am pretty amazed at how little it stumbles when it comes to words it doesn't recognize. Even with SF and Fantasy with made up names it does a credible job of intepreting them.
Your readers might like to know that the AT&T voices cost extra and are not included with the basic program. The included free voices are acceptable, but the AT&T true voices are definately worth the added cost.