Here are my thoughts on the two most recent episodes of Doctor Who:
1) The God Complex: WORST. EPISODE. EVER.
It wasn't the most poorly produced. The production values on numerous first generation Doctor Who episodes were far worse.
It wasn't the most un-scary episode ever. In fact, it was quite creepy.
It wasn't the stupidest episode ever. There have been far more stupid ones.
And it wasn't the most poorly scripted episode ever. Many aspects of the script were far tighter and better crafted than in other episodes.
What it was was the most offensive Doctor Who episode ever.
Now, like almost any human product, there have been offensive elements in Doctor Who before. And the presence of such elements is guaranteed by the fact that the BBC is a bastion of political correctness that is determined to place the British public in a Vulcan Death Grip of Political Correctness. I mean, literally (-ish). They're trying to kill the country by putting it in a straightjacket of anti-family, anti-life, pro-homosexual ideology that is bound to lead to further social disintegration and demographic winter.
But while offensive elements have been present in and marred previous Doctor Who episodes, never before have I seen an episode whose CENTRAL THESIS is morally offensive.
SPOILER ALERT! (in case you really want to protect yourself from the central spoiler in this stinkburger)
This episode centers around a nightmarish, Twilight Zone-like building that appears to be a hotel, though it's not. People find themselves in this building and are then driven crazy with fear, being forced to confront their own (apparently worst) fears. When that happens they then experience some kind of values inversion and become calm, accepting of their fate, and even incredibly and bizarrely happy, exclaiming "Praise him!"
The him in question turns out to be a minotaur (relative of the old Doctor Who monsters, the Nimons) who then shows up and kills them.
The Doctor then deduces (though some of this goes by way too fast in the dialogue to be fully intelligible–something I've complained about before) that the hotel is actually a prison ship, built to house the minotaur, who had previously pretended to be a god on a planet that eventually grew secular and kicked him out, imprisoning him on the ship/hotel forever.
To keep him alive (for he feeds on worship), the ship plucks people of faith off different planets and then forces them into situations of fear so that they will use their faith to cope with the fear. When this act of faith is elicited, the ship (or minotaur or something) converts their faith into worship of the minotaur so he can consume it and remain alive in his eternal prison.
THAT'S OFFENSIVE. PERIOD.
Subverting someone's faith in this way may be way creepy, but as entertainment it's disgusting. The reaction of the Muslim girl in the show, not wanting to have the Doctor witness the event as her faith is ripped from her and subverted into a twisted parody just before her death, was entirely correct. That is an obscene situation that should never have been filmed.
Now, there were all kinds of other problems with this episode, too. A notable one is that Rory is immune to all this because he allegedly doesn't have faith in anything, despite the fact that they established non-religious faith counts as faith. I'm sorry, but if faith isn't understood to be specifically religious then everybody has it. Everyone has faith in something. The law of gravity. Their spouse. Deduction and induction. Something. Maybe they could have defined the concept of faith such that it would exclude Rory, but they didn't do an adequate job of this.
Another flaw was not showing us the Doctor's own (worst?) fear. If you're promising us that the hotel holds even his worst fear then you've got to show it to us. You've made a promise to the audience that has to be kept, and this episode didn't fulfill its promise.
We may guess that his fear had to do with the death of companions (or some companions), though that doesn't fit with what we already know about the Doctor. He's lost companions before and has shown greater fears than letting those close to him die (note, e.g., that the thing he feared most in The End of Time was the return of the Timelords).
Bad writing.
Because if that's the answer then they need to spell it out. They need to show us the Doctor standing over the dead bodies of Amy and Rory and River and saying, "I can't let this happen."
And then they need to tell us why that's so much worse than the Timelords returning or the deaths of previous companions.
It all just rings hollow. The Doctor has lost companions before, and yet he kept going. Now we are expected, without explanation, that the thought of losing companions is just unbearable to him, and so he must dump Amy and Rory off in the 21st century–without resolving the whole baby Melody issue!
Yes, I know they could treat the events of Let's Kill Hitler as resolving that, but that's not really believable. The shape of the overall season arc is just wrong. They need to give us more than what we've seen onscreen if they want to convince us that Amy and Rory are reconciled to not getting to raise their own daughter.
The ending of the episode thus feels forced. It's just a way to get the Doctor to turn into the lonely, grumpy, old man who's been travelling alone for 200 years and is willing to accept death resignedly in The Impossible Astronaut.
This episode is trying to lay the groundwork for that, but it fails to do it convincingly.
Its central flaw, however, is that the central premise is baldly offensive and only goes to show the extreme spiritual poverty of modern day England and the moral and human blindness that prevented the producers from seeing just how offensive this episode is.
Okay, there's actually a good bit to like about this episode. It was a lot of fun to have Craig, from last season's The Lodger, back. It was nice to catch up with him and his family, and there was quite a bit of funny stuff in the episode. This show also established Craig as an official companion, even if he's never travelled in the TARDIS.
That said, this episode was NOT as good as The Lodger. It had some cute bits (including little Stormageddon, who was especially cute), but did not match the brilliance of the original.
The Cybermen were not scary enough. They were basically big, threatening monsters that didn't say a lot. My memory is that the Cybermen were far more . . . something . . . in the original run of Doctor Who. In the new series, with its shorter stories, I haven't found them nearly so.
Also, anybody notice that this was the second episode in this half of the season that had a climax involving a young father on his own making a climactic redeeming, emotional response involving his son? This time it worked better than in Night Terrors. In that one the monstrous threat was creepy and the father/son dynamic rang false. In this one the monstrous threat rang false (or at least rather unimpressive compared to its past) and the father/son dynamic worked.
The straight-people-being-mistaken-for-homosexuals innuendos/jokes were annoying (these seem to be the British equivalent of flatulence jokes in American teen films), but at least they didn't make the central element of the story a slap in the face to every person of faith.
This episode just didn't provide the kind of oomph that we needed at this point in the season. This is the penultimate episode, the springboard into the final episode where the whole season's story arc is supposed to pay off.
Here's the thing: If you want the Doctor to walk into the next episode a bitter, broken, lonely man willing to accept death then you need to end on a dramatic downer. You need a long and slow decline over multiple episodes that finally leads to a crushing defeat that breaks the central character's spirit and drives him into the pits of despair.
You don't make the penultimate outing a comedy episode.
I must admit that the final few minutes of the show, with the flashforward to River Song, was effective, but the rest of the episode leading up to that seemed misplaced.
I just didn't want to see a broken, lonely Doctor having a last commedic hurrah before going off to his death. That's not how the shape of the overall story should work.
If you're going to do an epic, tragic story (even though we all know the Doctor won't really stay dead), you don't structure it this way. In Lord of the Rings, Sam and Frodo don't get a last commedic romp for 45 minutes before they scale Mt. Doom. (And that's a pretty close analogy, time-wise, since this season of Doctor Who is 13 episodes long and the complete, expanded Peter Jackson trilogy is about 13 hours long, too).
While the audience does need commedic breaks in dramatic situations, the penultimate chapter can't be commedy or it destroys the forward momentum and dramatic tension building to the climax.
Or at least it rings false. Or wrong. Or hollow. Or in some way deficient.
Thus, while there was a good bit to like about Closing Time, it was not a great story (it did not live up to The Lodger) and was imroperly placed in this season's overall story.
Coming soon: The Wedding of River Song.



{ 20 comments }
I agree with you about the Cybermen. I thought they were rather boring. And while I’m at it, the Daleks got annoying in the 2-3 seasons. They were the “extinct” terrible beings, who just wouldn’t die. I don’t think they were the creepiest or most imaginative aliens the show came out with. Maybe it’s the metal robot look.
I agree with you about the Cybermen. I thought they were rather boring. And while I’m at it, the Daleks got annoying in the 2-3 seasons. They were the “extinct” terrible beings, who just wouldn’t die. I don’t think they were the creepiest or most imaginative aliens the show came out with. Maybe it’s the metal robot look.
Um, oops. How did that happen? Sorry about the repeating comments. When I want to be heard, I want to be heard!
Every day, in every way, not watching new Who is looking better and better.
The stupid thing here is that, generally, the show has insisted that faith in good and worthy things is a good thing, and that it’s particularly good (and monster-wise, salvific) that the Doctor and his companions have faith in each other and in traditional values and virtues. The new show got very shrill about faith in the Doctor and painting him as a godling, in fact. But faith in various good things has always been shown on the show as a way to resist various forms of mental takeovers.
Yet now it seems to be saying that faith in anything is bad, and that frankly there’s no sense trusting anybody, and oh yeah, certainly not the Doctor. Apparently the writers don’t see that the whole “Trust no one” meme depends on the viewer having some “side” that he does trust, and in maintaining a sort of alliance between writer, viewer, and the sole trustworthy character.
@Agnes
The Darleks are classic !!! As for the fact that they ALWAYS come back, I find it entertaining part of the consolation the doctor had was that although he killed his own kind he took the darleks with them, their constant return is a thorn in his side, tormenting him.
As for the part about Faith, What I like about Battlestar Galactica is the fact that Faith as a subject was treated seriously, far more so than any most shows.
@ Maureen and Jimmy — I saw it a little different. It seemed to me the true monsters of the episode were intended to be the athiests who imprisoned the minotaur and who kidnapped, emotionally tortured, murdered and then posthumously mocked people of belief (remember who must have put those gloating photos up in the “reception” area — it probably WASN’T the minotaur…). With the exception of the conspiracy dude (Joe was already pretty far gone — we never saw him pre-”cooking”), the other people of belief seem fairly level-headed — Rita is with it, intelligent AND devout (even earning her briefly a spot as Amy’s replacement), and Gibbis’ only fault is that his whole planet suffers from a racial neurosis that has them preferring to be conquered and oppressed.
This line from The Doctor is telling: “A distant cousin of the Nimon, they descend on planets and set themselves up as gods to be worshipped. Which is fine, until the inhabitants get all secular and advanced enough to build bonkers prisons.” In this line, The Doctor is not really giving a glowing assesment of the athiests who built the complex. Listen carefully to the tone of his voice. He has nothing but disgust and contempt for the people who built this complex and led so many to their deaths for the “crime” of belief.
Seriously, this episode was disturbing on a faith level, but I personally had a lot more heartburn as a Catholic with the “Clerics,” “Papal Mainframe” and “Headless Monks” of “A Good Man Goes To War.”
Jim,
I am rather surprised at your reaction to this episode of Dr Who.
I gave up watching the series ages ago when it became clear that it had absolute contempt for religion and for any concept of God. To say that the whole series enshrines left-wing, atheistic ideologies is an understatement.
The Dr Who series has, in fact, proposed, a whole range of bizarre (and contradictory) explanations of the origins and running of the universe – providing they have nothing to do with God.
Secular humanists and atheists would love the Dr Who series.
Wow, that doesn’t sound like the Dr Who I watched when I was a kid.
Agnes, what was that you said? *smile*
God Complex:
I agree with you Jimmy A. Having the people without faith survive creeped me out… and not in a “wow that was a cool episode” sort of way. It creeped me out in a “they are glorifying the problem with society today” way.
Also concerning the Doctor’s fears, I was waiting for them to show Daleks in the Doctor’s room. It might not have rung true for people, but at least it would have been logical.
Closing Time:
I thought this episode was starting off as a tribute to Rose Tyler. The way this episode played off to me was the “meh” first half of a double episode. The second episode would have focused on the Doctor in the ship and the Cybermen’s plot.
The last part with River Song read to me like a special prequel to another episode. Or, maybe they should have had be the pre-opening credits segment of the last episode. All in all, “Closing Time” wasn’t offensive… more like boring.
As a fan of sci-fi I keep reluctantly retrying BBC and keep gettting burned.
I eagerly jumped into Dr Who 2005. Then torchwood came out. I watched several episodes and after it got going I was so disgusted by the over the top homosexuality i turned off both Torchwood and Dr Who. I didn’t watch Dr Who again for a year and a half.
I had started watching it again. Then it is starting to get dicey again with “A Good Man Goes to War.” I didn’t turn it off there. Then to see how faith was handled in “The God Complex” I don’t know if I’m going to even bother watching this next “Wedding of River Song” where presumably Song will assassinate the Dr.
Also another reason I’m thinking about not watching BBC again is because of a grotesque show about supposedly misfit superheros that is so morally disgusting I was ill at ease for days.
I am eagerly looking forward to Terra Nova. It looks like it was expensive but after the success of Lost perhaps media companies are willing to bet again on sci-fi. The first episode I watched was great; action packed, dystopian future, time travel, laser guns, dinosours. And an early plot mover was the value of life over a government family planning program.
The several episodes I watched of alphas (seemingly an x-men knock off) was kind of underwhelming but I will give it some more time. I think they are going to focus a lot more on character development. But I don’t know if they will address the existential issues or the powers-as-curse aspects x-men did. I may watch more as they become available at sci-fi’s (ug syfy’s) website but its not on the top of my list because it doesn’t have as much as that sense of mystery that even Heros had for the first season.
It seems that, more or less, mainstream thought in the UK has been explicitly anti-religious for some time. In the US, that attitude is relatively new (the New York Times is starting to take militant atheism seriously).
In Canada and most of Europe, it is a criminal offense to promote traditional attitudes towards homosexuality. I’m not surprised that Doctor Who has gone down to this level. I miss the Tom Baker episodes.
The anti-religious theme is an element in the new Doctor Who productions that is quite disturbing. The latest Torchwood spin-off production not only derides the Church but throws explicit homo-eroticism into the faces of viewers. Do they no longer care that many of the fans are people of faith? Maybe I am a fuddy-duddy, but I much prefer the slower pace of the old Doctor Who programs and had enough imagination of my own to look around the tacky production values. I had a nice talk with Sylvester McCoy some years back and he delighted us with fond memories of his time as a youth in seminary. Similarly, I offered Mass at a Chicago Dr. Who convention some years back, at the request of Caroline John (the companion Liz Shaw to Pertwee). She read at the Mass and made Sunday Mass a requirement for her attendance at the convention. She is a devout Catholic.
@Jack, I guess the idea of having that nemesis come back is ok, not my favorite, but ok. However, I didn’t really care for the big metalic robot, that really isn’t that scary, that you can’t reason with or talk to, and just keeps saying “exterminate, exterminate” in that grating, raspy voice. Maybe it’s just me, but I got bored.
Why, Fr. Joe, you should write a book. I can just imagine the title: Who knew? Time Lords meet the Lord of Time or maybe: God is in the details (and in the
The Chicken).
Yikes!
Should read:
Why, Fr. Joe, you should write a book. I can just imagine the title: Who knew? Time Lords meet the Lord of Time or maybe: God is in the details (and in the Tardis).
The Chicken
Re: Caroline John, she’s done a free-to-download reading of some books of the Bible for the Lambs, a group of evangelicals recovering from being sexually abused, or harassed in various ways, by ministers in their churches (headed by a longtime US Dr Who fan, hence the connection). It’s a heck of a nice reading. There’s Mark, Matthew, and now Romans.
The Lambs Audio Bible.
Er, Luke, not Matthew. Sorry.
I hope everyone enjoyed the finale as much as I did. Just replayed it to see if it held up and it did.
Was that the best season ever? I’ve been catching episodes from the Tenth Doctor and can’t think of any that are momentous enough or entertaining enough to want to watch again.
Were we watching different finales then, Spambot? I thought that The Wedding of River Song was disappointing at best, insulting to the intelligence at worst.
lol, Pat Payne. I guess so. They answered so many open questions from that last couple of weeks, and they didn’t introduce new characters of significance, etc. So, the technical aspects were done well. It hit the right emotional tone, too — sadness because of impending loss.
I should wait for Jimmy’s analysis before going on. Sorry you didn’t like it though.
Comments on this entry are closed.